Agreement On Humane Trapping Standards

“The agreement on international humane trapping standards has a measurable impact on animal welfare through the use of certified fishing systems and educational programs.” Any trap used under the supervision of a licence must be certified in accordance with international standards relating to the humanity of the traps and be suitable for the living human capture of the aforementioned species. The agreement requires standards for the certification and certification of fishing gear for wildlife. The requirement that traps meet standards applies to all traps used to capture wildlife species listed for all purposes (including traps used to manage damage to game, protect human health and management of game diseases, scientific research and fur and meat harvest). When traps are completed for a species, the use of unsealed traps in accordance with the standards of the agreement is prohibited. Aversivity can be assessed by capturing the animal in an easily recognized situation, then exposing the animal to the trap in the corresponding situation and assessing its behaviour. The principle of the decision that a fishing method is humane is that it meets the thresholds set out in Sections 2 and 3. If necessary, a broader range of measures should be considered when considering traps. Field trials should include studies on the effects of traps on target and non-target species. This agreement applies to fishing methods and certification of traps used to capture wild land or semi-aquatic mammals listed in Schedule I, Understood that: at least one person must be experienced in the use of traps and be able to capture the animals used in the test and at least one person experienced in each of the animal welfare assessment methods to contain traps and methods of assessment of unconsciousness for killing the traps I didn`t do.

For example, the assessment of behavioural responses to traps and aversiveities should be conducted, particularly by a trained person who is aware of the interpretation of these data. CONSIDERING that despite the absence of humane international trapping standards, a number of different legal systems have been introduced and legislation has been introduced to improve fishing methods and the welfare of wild animals; and, although well-being may vary considerably, the term “human” is used only for fishing methods that maintain the welfare of the animals concerned at a sufficient level, although it is recognized that in some situations where death traps are put to death, there will be a short period during which welfare may be low. The aiHTS definition of human fishing methods “refers to traps certified by the competent authorities, which comply with AIHTS standards and are used to define the conditions set by producers.” Notwithstanding the fact that fishing methods must meet the requirements of Sections 2.4 and 3.4, consideration should be given to further improving the design and classification of traps, in particular: 2. For non-WTO parties, this agreement does not affect their rights and obligations arising from bilateral agreements between the parties listed in Appendix II. limiting fishing methods three to five years after the agreement comes into force, based on testing priorities and the availability of testing facilities; and trappers are trained in the humane, safe and effective use of fishing methods, including new methods of development; A number of animal species in Britain will be better protected today as new international humane trapping standards come into force. Some animals must be equipped with telemetry recorders (for example. B for recording heart rate, respiratory rate) before the test. Such a set-up must be done long enough before capture to allow the animal to recover from the disturbances caused by the seizure of these recorders.

Comments are closed.