This Job Is Not Covered By The Existing Collective Bargaining Agreement

One challenge for the UAW (and other unions in their respective sectors) is that employers are trying to circumvent the terms of the collective agreement by setting up new businesses outside the scope of the agreement. For example, GM created with its partner LG Chem a new company, Lordstown Motors, to build a new plant next to the existing plant in Lordstown, Ohio, rather than doing the work at the Lordstown plant as part of the UAWu2012GM27 agreement The NLRA could be amended to include provisions to extend the terms of a collective agreement to a group of workers, 44 An example of this type of extension is the Baigent-Ready proposal, named after two special advisors to the British Columbia Minister of Labour. According to the proposal, a union in a sector (defined as a geographical area with similar companies carrying out similar activities) with low union density would have the possibility to apply for certification for a multi-employer unit in that sector if the union could prove the help of at least 45% of the workers at each site within the proposed unit. Certified trade unions would then submit individual elections at each company site and the collective agreement negotiated in the sector would automatically be extended to new entities organised in the sector45. This approach would facilitate the extension of wage and social standards to reorganized groups and save workers, unions and employers time and costs to negotiate a new collective agreement. The National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) – the primary law that establishes drainage rights in the private sector – has as its premise a high and admirable goal: “To promote the practice and collective bargaining” between workers and their employers.1 Since the law was passed in 1935, millions of working men and women have received higher wages. improved health care and pensions, better protection of health and safety in the workplace and other important improvements through the creation of trade unions and the use of their collective strength in negotiations with their employers.2 In the past, strong unions have contributed to widespread income growth, and not just to the wealthiest households (see Chart A).3 The United Workers have the density and strength that the union has used a national bargaining relationship with the International Document (IP). In the past, the relationship between the union and IP has been controversial and negotiations between many regions and indigenous people have been fragmented, but the union is now negotiating with IP two national agreements that set wages and social benefits. One agreement concerns 5,800 workers in 17 paper mills, and the other provides for 4,700 workers in 55 boxing factories throughout the country.

Site-specific issues will then be negotiated at the local level. The union represents employees in about 70% of IP mills and 60% of IP box factories. In contrast, the union represents workers in only four of the 18 Kimberly Clark locations and the union has not yet managed to win national negotiations at Kimberly Clark.23 Answer: Yes. Collective bargaining concerns the definition of working conditions, including restructuring. The specific conditions of a collective agreement fall within the competence of the negotiating parties. It is customary to include in the debate provisions on consultation procedures, the provision of information and the involvement of employees and their representatives when an undertaking is considering a change likely to affect workers, their conditions of employment or their employment in general. . . .

Comments are closed.